| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
Recent Posts
- Illinois Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against HIV/AIDS Nonprofit
- California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger Signs Budget That Cuts $52M From HIV/AIDS Programs
- Efforts Underway In Namibia To Treat Pediatric HIV
- HIV/AIDS Education Project Targeting Pennsylvania Black Women Examined
- Also In Global Health News: Uganda Male Circumcision; Malaria Vaccine; Potential Global Fund Grant In Cambodia; PMTCT Of HIV In Botswana
Random Posts
- Also In Global Health News: Global Fund Audit; Indonesia's Health System; Bread For The World Founder Profiled
- Groundbreaking DKT/TOTAL Ethiopia Initiative To Promote Condoms To Housemaids Launched
- Directly Observed Antiretroviral Therapy Offers No Benefit Over Self-Administered Treatment For HIV Patients
- Connecticut HIV/AIDS Advocates Lobby Legislature For Continued Funding
- Obama Proposes $63B Global Health Initiative Over Six Years
- Sex Workers In Pakistan Give Recommendations On HIV Prevention To Health Officials
- Obesity May Have Adverse Role In HIV Treatment
- Liverpool To Strengthen Health Research In Africa
- New Issue Of MAMBO Magazine Raises Questions About Faith And Sexual Health
- Current Multi-Omponent Vaccines May Need Reworking, According To Study
Prescription AIDS Drugs
Contact Us
UN Secretary-General Urges Countries To Follow The United States And Lift Travel Restrictions For People Living With HIV
April 07th, 2010
UNAIDS welcomes President Obama’s
announcement of the final rule removing entry restrictions based on HIV status from US
policy. The removal of HIV-related travel restrictions in the US overturns a policy that had
been in place since 1987. Such restrictions, strongly opposed by UNAIDS, are discriminatory
and do not protect public health.
“I congratulate President Obama on announcing the removal of the travel restrictions for
people living with HIV from entering the United States,” said United Nations Secretary-
General Ban Ki-moon. “I urge all other countries with such restrictions to take steps to
remove them at the earliest.”
The United Nations Secretary-General has made the removal of stigma and discrimination
faced by people living with HIV a personal issue. He called for the removal of travel
restrictions for the first time in his address to the General Assembly during the High Level
Meeting on AIDS in 2008. “That they should be discriminated against, including through
restrictions on their ability to travel between countries, should fill us all with shame,” said
Secretary-General Ban in a speech to the Global AIDS Conference in August last year.
At his request, several countries including his home country, the Republic of Korea, are in
the last stages of removing travel restrictions. Other countries that are considering removal
of travel restrictions include China and Ukraine. In 2008, the UNAIDS board strongly
encouraged all countries to eliminate HIV-specific restrictions on entry, stay and residence
and ensure that people living with HIV are no longer excluded, detained or deported on the
basis of HIV status.
“Placing travel restrictions on people living with HIV has no public health justification. It is
also a violation of human rights,” said Michel Sidibe, Executive Director of UNAIDS. “We
hope that other countries that still have travel restrictions will remove them at the earliest.”
Nearly 59 countries impose some form of travel restrictions on people living with HIV. The
International Guidelines on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights state that any restriction on liberty
of movement or choice of residence based on suspected or real HIV status alone, including
HIV screening of international travellers, is discriminatory. Travel restrictions do not have an
economic justification either. People living with HIV can now lead long and productive
working lives, a fact that modifies the economic argument underlying blanket restrictions;
concern about migrants’ drain on health resources must be weighed with their potential
contribution.
Source
UNAIDS
IRIN Examines HIV/AIDS Advocates’ Reaction To U.N. Agency For Women
September 28th, 2009
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
|
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
|
| Article Opinions: | 0 posts |
IRIN examines how a recent resolution to create an agency to promote women’s “rights and wellbeing” by the U.N. General Assembly is being welcomed by international HIV/AIDS advocates. According to IRIN, “[w]omen make up 60 percent of people living with AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, a figure that rises to 75 percent in the 15-24 age range. In Asia, nearly 50 million women are at risk of becoming infected with HIV from their partners.”
The agency is seen as “long overdue” by some HIV/AIDS advocates. “‘We see this not as an end but a beginning - the U.N.’s first attempt to form a serious gender entity, and the Secretary-General’s opportunity to make a monumental change both in the way the U.N. operates, and in the lives of women everywhere,’ said Stephen Lewis, co-director of AIDS-Free World and former U.N. special envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa,” IRIN writes.
“We hope the new agency will help with advocacy around women’s issues, and will lead to more grass-roots support for HIV-positive women,” Marion Natukunda, project director for a Ugandan NGO, said. According to IRIN, “AIDS-Free World urged U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to reserve a seat for the head of the women’s agency on the Committee of Co-sponsoring Organizations that comprise UNAIDS” (9/18).
This information was reprinted from globalhealth.kff.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Global Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at globalhealth.kff.org.
© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
